The end of HR is here, it’s time to start saying People & Culture instead.

The first debate in this episode draws inspiration from a recent LinkedIn discussion sparked by an article titled “People and Culture vs. HR – what’s the difference.” This post ignited significant interest, garnering over 1,200 reactions and a lively exchange of thoughts in the comments section. Several perspectives emerged from the discussion:

• One individual suggested that the transition from HR to People and Culture is not a matter of opposition but rather an evolutionary step. This shift emphasizes a focus on employee engagement over traditional administrative duties.
• Another commenter argued that the title is less important than the functions and responsibilities. Whether called CHRO or CPCO, the transition to a People and Culture focus is essential for all HR functions.
• A third viewpoint sees the rebranding as a move toward a more holistic management of employee experiences, highlighting the importance of leadership in shaping organizational culture.

The conversation continued as the LinkedIn algorithm surfaced related posts, including insights from Adam Horne. Horne questioned whether “culture” should be part of HR and People job titles, ultimately supporting its inclusion but noting that HR should lead cultural design and change. These discussions lead us to today’s first statement for debate: “The end of HR is here, it’s time to start saying People & Culture instead.”